Morgan
SGI NSW Cup
3. LKT
2. LPT
1. Toby Couchman
2. LPT
1. Toby Couchman
But it was the players actions ie the challenge that drew the penalty - the system rewards diving its f*cking patheticLast night Moses gets a penalty for falling down around the ankles of the defender who clipped him and they end up winning the game, Dragons cop 4 hits to the head and crickets, ridiculous..
How good is back to back wins? Can we dare to dream that we may just avoid the spoon?
Positives:
- We showed great resilience to get momentum back at the beginning of both halves when the Tigers had a heap of posession. In the recent past we give up in these situations and let the opposition dominate.
- Hamish is going from strength to strength in the second row. He, LKT, Val and Sloan are producing some great attack on the left edge which is great because not much is happening on Kyle's side. Well done to the Big D on unleashing Hamish on the edge it is paying dividends already.
- Scramble defence was pretty good overall, we made some crucial one on one tackles especially towards the end to stop the Tigers come back.
Negatives:
- The right side attack is still pathetic and I feel sorry for Egan that he isn't being given as much opportunity as Hamish to show his attacking credentials, we can thank KF for that.
- We need to get out of the business of trying to defend narrow leads with 20 mins to go. 12 points is nothing in the modern game, we put the cue in the rack and stopped trying to score points for the last 20 mins which helped the Tigers back in to it. We should keep looking to score points and go on with the win. This is a key reason why we haven't seen many big margin wins for such a long time.
- Who do we have to cosy up to so that we can finally get some fair officiating? Multiple high tackles/HIAs with no repercussions or penalties whatsoever.
Shoulder is cactusVal was overall pretty good, but geez he's got some errors, and missed tackles in him.
Hopefully next year he will be one of our wingers.
Agree with you I I'm Hornby. Yes the right side needs a lot of work. KF has no flare and is too robotic. Replacing him with Metcalf or Reed next year will improve that. LKT on the improve very much so and while Atko isn't my cup of tea at full back, he acquitted himself OK. Haven't read why Gutho didn't play. I think if he had played today we would have been better. Next week will be great if we can jag three in a row.How good is back to back wins? Can we dare to dream that we may just avoid the spoon?
Positives:
- We showed great resilience to get momentum back at the beginning of both halves when the Tigers had a heap of posession. In the recent past we give up in these situations and let the opposition dominate.
- Hamish is going from strength to strength in the second row. He, LKT, Val and Sloan are producing some great attack on the left edge which is great because not much is happening on Kyle's side. Well done to the Big D on unleashing Hamish on the edge it is paying dividends already.
- Scramble defence was pretty good overall, we made some crucial one on one tackles especially towards the end to stop the Tigers come back.
Negatives:
- The right side attack is still pathetic and I feel sorry for Egan that he isn't being given as much opportunity as Hamish to show his attacking credentials, we can thank KF for that.
- We need to get out of the business of trying to defend narrow leads with 20 mins to go. 12 points is nothing in the modern game, we put the cue in the rack and stopped trying to score points for the last 20 mins which helped the Tigers back in to it. We should keep looking to score points and go on with the win. This is a key reason why we haven't seen many big margin wins for such a long time.
- Who do we have to cosy up to so that we can finally get some fair officiating? Multiple high tackles/HIAs with no repercussions or penalties whatsoever.
How many times have you seen a player get hit in the head and the bunker tell the ref to blow a penalty...if the bunker can indicate its a penalty when you challenge it they certainly can tell the ref, that was high they had ample time to do it.But it was the players actions ie the challenge that drew the penalty - the system rewards diving its f*cking pathetic